Dr. Michele Nealon, President of The Chicago School.
For decades, workplace mental health has been treated as a personal matter, separate from productivity, performance and organizational outcomes. Today, that separation no longer holds.
As labor markets fluctuate and work becomes more complex and demanding, mental health and well-being have become decisive economic variables. According to a recent study from the McKinsey Health Institute, each dollar invested in scaling mental health interventions could have a fivefold economic return. They influence workforce participation, retention, innovation capacity and institutional resilience. For organizations across sectors, including higher education, mental health infrastructure is no longer an optional benefit; it is foundational to how work is done and how missions are sustained.
This often invisible but increasingly important space can be described as a mental health economy, a reality in which organizational success is tied to how effectively leaders and institutions integrate mental health into everyday operations, decision-making and culture.
Learning From Experience: The Chicago School Model
Higher education represents a segment prone to overexertion and mental health challenges. Faculty, staff and administrator burnout rates remain high, particularly in the medical and mental health fields, due to intense workloads, emotional labor and regulatory pressure and ongoing pressure to excel in a demanding environment.
In the years following the pandemic, reports of mental health challenges reached an all-time high, with nearly two-thirds of faculty in the U.S., across all disciplines, reporting burnout related to work, according to the American Psychological Association (APA).
As an institution traditionally focused on mental health and behavioral sciences education, The Chicago School emphasizes psychological safety and well-being in its approach to workforce management, treating them not as suggestions but as performance, learning and innovation drivers.
The university has an explicit intention to embed well-being throughout the experiences of students, staff and faculty. Leadership consistently and deliberately moves away from prebuilt, one-size-fits-all models and instead engages faculty, staff and students directly in the design process whenever possible.
Participatory, inclusive work models, as recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO), are associated with reduced burnout among about 74% of employees and improved workplace outcomes, including a reduction in turnover.
For organizations focused on medical education, this methodology also aligns with the integrated health philosophy, which recognizes the interdependence of physical and mental health. A premise that underpins The Chicago School foundation and is the bedrock of the Illinois College of Osteopathic Medicine (IllinoisCOM), the first medical school built in Chicago in almost a century.
While the IllinoisCOM work remains ongoing, the positive outcomes of our continued investments in collaborative, human-centered workflows are evident. Moreover, one can see how these practices transcend perceived boundaries between programs, fostering interdisciplinarity, sowing innovation, promoting communication and a speak-up culture and, overall, advancing the university’s mission. It’s an example that can be extrapolated beyond higher education.
Mental Health As An Infrastructure Imperative
Just as physical safety standards emerged during the industrial era and have continued to evolve, mental health has become a structural imperative for organizations today.
The U.S. Surgeon General’s “Framework for Workplace Mental Health & Well-Being” highlights how unaddressed mental health contributes to absenteeism (up 33% in 2023), higher turnover and rising disability claims. It also affects focus, decision-making and capacity for complex problem-solving, according to Berkley Executive Education; capabilities that are essential in academic and knowledge-driven institutions. Understanding this is the first step to preventing organizations from losing productivity and momentum.
At the same time, workforce expectations have shifted. About 18% of U.S. workers report having a mental condition, and nearly two in five workers “report that their work environment has had a negative impact on their mental health.” A 2022 APA survey shows that 81% of employees consider how employers support mental health in the workplace when deciding where to work and whether to stay. Beyond compensation and flexibility, employees consider whether the organization creates conditions that support sustainable performance.
These expectations cut across generations, reflecting a structural change. For institutions whose success depends on talent, trust and intellectual engagement, this reality carries strategic implications; after all, the cost of poor mental health is borne not just by individuals but by institutions and society.
Leadership Accountability In The Mental Health Economy
One of the most significant shifts brought about by the mental health economy is where responsibility lies.
Mental health is no longer just an individual resilience issue. While personal coping skills and boundaries matter, organizational culture, leadership behavior and system design play a decisive role in shaping a better work experience.
Leaders can influence their teams’ mental health by managing expectations; allocating resources; designing roles, policies and workflows; encouraging feedback and trust; modeling boundaries; and creating space for feedback, learning and recovery. When these elements are in place, teams are more willing to take risks, innovate and collaborate to problem-solve.
Access to resources such as employee assistance programs is essential, but it does not produce a culture of well-being on its own. Sustainable impact comes when leadership accountability shifts from rhetoric to consistent, direct action, supported by clear guardrails to protect mental health—for instance, respecting non-work time, cultivating relationships, engaging workers in decisions, promoting recognition and offering opportunities for training and mentoring.
In the mental health economy, leadership behavior that is consistently fair and transparent is a structural driver of employee trust, psychological safety and sustained performance.
Why The Future Depends On Mental Health
In the mental health economy, well-being is no longer separate from how institutions work. It is, in fact, shaping the future of work, learning and leadership.
Organizations that embed well-being in their foundations will be better positioned to attract and retain talent, sustain performance, innovate at scale and adapt to uncertain environments. Those who continue to view mental health as a perk may find themselves facing deeper workforce challenges disguised as productivity problems.
For higher education leaders, the opportunity and the responsibility are clear: to steward institutions in ways that recognize mental health not as a competing priority but as a condition for fulfilling our missions.
Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
