Many retirees depend on Social Security benefits during retirement, but a newly proposed change would cap benefits for certain retirees. As lawmakers scramble for solutions to the Social Security fund’s projected depletion in the early 2030s, some proposals, like this plan, are directly targeting higher earners.
In an effort to stretch program funds, the plan could potentially limit how much higher earners collect in retirement, emphasizing the importance of retirees having personal savings and other forms of income beyond Social Security.
Here’s what you should know about the proposed change and whether it could affect your retirement plan.
Find Out: 14 benefits seniors are entitled to but often forget to claim
How the proposed cap would work
A Trust Fund Solutions Initiative white paper proposes establishing a maximum benefit level for Social Security recipients. While some of the wealthiest couples receive approximately $100,000 a year in Social Security benefits, this paper proposes setting a six-figure limit.
Under the limit, a couple retiring at the Normal Retirement Age (between 65 and 67, depending on birth year) would receive no more than $100,000 per year in benefits. An individual who retires at the Normal Retirement Age would receive no more than $50,000 in annual benefits.
Who really has the cheapest auto insurance in your area? Check your zip code here.
Who would be impacted by the change
The proposed change would affect a small fraction of retirees who are the highest income earners collecting Social Security. Those affected would have earned at least the Social Security taxable maximum, which is currently $184,500 per year, for at least 35 years.
Currently, very few people collect $100,000 annually from Social Security, but as the benefit formula grows with time, more retirees qualify for this higher benefit limit. Most current beneficiaries would likely see little or no immediate change if this proposed change were implemented.
How the cap would reflect different situations
Several different factors, including marital status and the age at which retirees collect Social Security, would determine how the cap would be applied to a couple or individual. For example, if both spouses of a couple collect Social Security at age 62, their benefits would be limited to $70,000 per year, since benefits are reduced if you collect them early.
Retirees who collect benefits later on would have a higher cap, because benefit amounts are increased if you delay collecting them. If a couple claims Social Security at different ages, the limit would be adjusted to reflect the blend of factors in that situation.
Retire like the rich: 14 ways you could build wealth in your 50s.
The concern over Social Security funds
Measures like this proposed cap are efforts to address the fact that trust fund reserves are predicted to be depleted. An analysis by the Social Security Administration and the Congressional Budget Office predicts that the Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, which supports retirees and their survivors and dependents, could be depleted by 2032.
The program faces several challenges. More Americans have become eligible to collect benefits, but simultaneously, the ratio of workers paying into the program per retiree has declined, leading to a strain on funds that are paid out to beneficiaries. America’s large aging population has put added pressure on the program, and benefits spending has rapidly grown.
What the proposed cap could accomplish
According to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, the proposed cap would immediately begin generating savings, and over time, it could improve the funding stability of the Social Security program.
Over 10 years, the cap would save the program $100 billion. That $100 billion would cover approximately one-fifth of the program’s 75-year funding shortage. If paired with other measures and reforms, this cap could help preserve the program, though it won’t solve the Social Security program’s funding gap on its own.
What lawmakers are doing to save Social Security
The proposed cap is part of a broader policy conversation surrounding Social Security. Lawmakers are weighing benefit cuts, tax increases, and structural reforms to stabilize and prolong the program.
Both Congressional parties have introduced Social Security solvency plans that incorporate strategies like increasing the program’s revenue and reducing benefits paid out. However, legislators have yet to identify or pass a concrete solution that would keep the program solvent.
Make Money: 8 things to do if you’re barely scraping by financially
The pros of capping Social Security benefits
The idea of a Social Security benefit cap is a contentious topic, but there are some potential advantages. Capping benefits could help protect lower-income retirees who are likely to depend on Social Security benefits more than the wealthy individuals or couples affected by the cap.
The cap could also help improve the program’s finances, so Social Security could continue to support lower-income retirees who depend on the benefits.
The cons of capping Social Security benefits
While a cap could have advantages, it could also undermine the program’s earned-benefit structure; the Social Security website explains that benefits are calculated based on an individual’s average indexed monthly earnings. The benefits reflect the average of up to 35 years of the worker’s earnings. If that structure is changed, higher earners may decline to contribute to the program, reducing its finances and, essentially, backfiring.
Bottom line
The Social Security cap is just a proposed idea at this time, and no changes are final yet. However, proposals like this emphasize the importance of finding a solution to the Social Security program’s solvency, and benefit adjustments are one potential way to do that.
A cap or a similar proposal could shape the benefits that future retirees receive, highlighting the importance of developing a retirement plan that doesn’t fully depend on Social Security benefits.
More from FinanceBuzz:
