Close Menu

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Who Could Face A $500 Reduction?

    September 1, 2026

    The Expectation vs. Reality Gap & 6 Ways You Can Manage It

    September 1, 2026

    what families want staff to understand

    September 1, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Who Could Face A $500 Reduction?
    • The Expectation vs. Reality Gap & 6 Ways You Can Manage It
    • what families want staff to understand
    • Pokémon Fans Rally to Help Child After He Was Scammed Out of His Most Valuable Card
    • 3 Steps to Support Mental Health for Rural Youth
    • September recognized as Suicide Prevention Month
    • The Growing Role Of Body Massage In Modern Self-Care » IndiaPost NewsPaper
    • When is the official 2027 Social Security COLA announcement? Mark your calendar
    Moving MountainsMoving Mountains
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Tuesday, September 1
    • Home
    • Mental Health
    • Life Skills
    • Self-Care
    • Well-Being
    • Awareness
    • Inspiration
    • Workers Comp
    • Social Security
      • Injuries
      • Disability Support
      • Community
    Moving MountainsMoving Mountains
    Home » How does California Handle Dispute Resolution in Utilization Reviews?
    Workers Comp

    How does California Handle Dispute Resolution in Utilization Reviews?

    TECHBy TECHApril 9, 2026No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    How does California Handle Dispute Resolution in Utilization Reviews?
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest WhatsApp Email

                                   

    Compliance Corner

    In California, when utilization review results in a denial or modification of treatment, state law provides a mechanism for challenging the decision. So, how does such a dispute find resolution? As Simply Research subscribers know, the Golden State has procedures for that.

    Basic Rule

    A request for independent medical review of a utilization review decision that denies or modifies a medical treatment request must be filed by an eligible party by mail, facsimile, or electronic transmission with the Administrative Director, or the Administrative Director’s designee, within 30 days of service of the written utilization review determination issued by the claims administrator under section 9792.9.5(e).

    Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule

    If the utilization review decision only denies or modifies a medical treatment request for a drug listed on the MTUS Drug List, the request for independent medical review must be filed by the eligible party within 10 days of service of the written utilization review decision.

    Which Form?

    A request for independent medical review must be made on the Application for Independent Medical Review, DWC Form IMR, and submitted with a copy of the written decision denying or modifying the request for authorization of medical treatment. At the time of filing, the employee shall concurrently provide a copy of the signed DWC Form IMR, without a copy of the written decision denying, or modifying the request for authorization of medical treatment, to the claims administrator.

    Eligible Parties

    A party eligible to file a request for independent medical review includes:

    (1) The employee or, if the employee is represented, the employee’s attorney. If the employee’s attorney files the DWC Form IMR, the form must be accompanied by a notice of representation or other document or written designation confirming representation.

    (A) A parent, guardian, conservator, relative, or other designee of the employee pursuant to Labor Code section 4610.5(j).

    (B) The physician whose request for authorization of medical treatment was denied or modified may join with or otherwise assist the employee in seeking an independent medical review. The physician may submit documents on the employee’s behalf pursuant to section 9792.10.5 (b) and may respond to any inquiry by the independent review organization.

    (2) A provider of emergency medical treatment pursuant to Labor Code section 4610.5(h)(4).

    Expedited Review

    If expedited review is requested for a utilization review decision eligible for independent medical review, the Application for Independent Medical Review, DWC Form IMR, shall include, unless the initial utilization review decision was made on an expedited basis, written certification from the employee’s treating physician with documentation confirming that the employee faces an imminent and serious threat to his or her health as described in section 9792.6.1(j).

    Timelines

    (1) If, at the time of a utilization review decision, the claims administrator is also disputing liability for the treatment for any reason besides medical necessity, the time limitation for the employee to submit an application for independent medical review shall not begin to run until the claims administrator serves a notice to the employee stating that the dispute of liability has been resolved.

    (2) If the claims administrator provides the employee with a written utilization review determination modifying or denying a treatment request that does not contain the required elements set forth in section 9792.9.5(e) at the time of notification of its utilization review decision, the time limitations for the employee to submit an application for independent medical review shall not begin to run until the claims administrator provides the written decision, with all required elements, to the employee.

    Appeals

    (1) Nothing in this section precludes the parties from participating in an internal utilization review appeal process on a voluntary basis provided the employee and, if the employee is represented by counsel, the employee’s attorney, have been notified of the timeframes in which to file an application for independent medical review. Any request by the injured worker or treating physician for an internal utilization review appeal process must be submitted to the claims administrator within 10 days after the receipt of the utilization review decision.

    (2) A request for an internal utilization review appeal must be completed, and a determination issued, by the claims administrator within 30 days after receipt of the request. If the utilization review decision only denies or modifies a medical treatment request for a drug listed on the MTUS Drug List, the internal utilization review appeal must be completed, and a determination issued, by the claims administrator within 10 days after receipt of the request under. An internal utilization review appeal shall be considered complete upon the issuance of a final independent medical review determination under section 9792.10.6(e) that determines the medical necessity of the disputed treatment.

    (3) Any determination by the claims administrator following an internal utilization review appeal that results in a modification of the requested medical treatment shall be communicated to the requesting physician and the injured worker, the injured worker’s representative, and if the injured worker is represented by counsel, the injured worker’s attorney according to the requirements set forth in section 9792.9.5(e). The Application for Independent Medical Review, DWC Form IMR, that accompanies the written decision letter under section 9792.9.5(e)(7), must indicate that the decision is a modification after appeal.

                   

    California Dispute Handle resolution Reviews Utilization
    TECH
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Medication Step Therapy in Workers’ Compensation

    September 1, 2026

    Your Brain’s a Muscle, so don’t let AI Take it from You

    September 1, 2026

    Meet the Executive Council: Stephanie Neuenfeldt

    August 31, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Don't Miss
    Social Security

    Who Could Face A $500 Reduction?

    By TECHSeptember 1, 20260

    Social Security Benefit Cuts August: Social Security isn’t expected to suddenly stop. The bigger worry…

    The Expectation vs. Reality Gap & 6 Ways You Can Manage It

    September 1, 2026

    what families want staff to understand

    September 1, 2026

    Pokémon Fans Rally to Help Child After He Was Scammed Out of His Most Valuable Card

    September 1, 2026
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Pinterest
    • Instagram
    • YouTube
    • Vimeo
    Our Picks

    Who Could Face A $500 Reduction?

    September 1, 2026

    The Expectation vs. Reality Gap & 6 Ways You Can Manage It

    September 1, 2026

    what families want staff to understand

    September 1, 2026

    Pokémon Fans Rally to Help Child After He Was Scammed Out of His Most Valuable Card

    September 1, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from SmartMag about art & design.

    About Us

    At Moving Mountains, we believe that every individual has strength, value, and purpose—regardless of mental health challenges or physical disabilities. This platform was created to inspire hope, promote understanding, and empower people to live meaningful and confident lives beyond limitations.

    Latest Post

    Who Could Face A $500 Reduction?

    September 1, 2026

    The Expectation vs. Reality Gap & 6 Ways You Can Manage It

    September 1, 2026

    what families want staff to understand

    September 1, 2026
    Recent Posts
    • Who Could Face A $500 Reduction?
    • The Expectation vs. Reality Gap & 6 Ways You Can Manage It
    • what families want staff to understand
    • Pokémon Fans Rally to Help Child After He Was Scammed Out of His Most Valuable Card
    • 3 Steps to Support Mental Health for Rural Youth
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2026 movingmountains. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.